> > >> You should have. The system enforces (or tries to) that a view can't be
> > >> part of an inheritance hierarchy, but you seem to have managed to find a
> > >> sequence of operations that avoids those checks. Turning a table into a
> > >> view with a manual CREATE RULE operation has always been a kluge, and
> > >> it's missing a check that the table isn't part of an inheritance tree.
Is there a "specific" reason why views can't be part of an inheritance tree?
I mean: it's that we "don't want" it or it would be just difficult to implement?
L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail: http://it.docs.yahoo.com/nowyoucan.html
pgsql-general by date
|Next:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 2008-03-03 23:26:57|
|Subject: Re: partitioning using dblink |
|Previous:||From: Dee||Date: 2008-03-03 21:33:22|
|Subject: Re: beginner: what permissions required to install on windows 2000+|