Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: partitioning using dblink

From: Scara Maccai <m_lists(at)yahoo(dot)it>
To: pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: partitioning using dblink
Date: 2008-03-03 22:57:35
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-general
> > >> You should have.  The system enforces (or tries to) that a view can't be
> > >> part of an inheritance hierarchy, but you seem to have managed to find a
> > >> sequence of operations that avoids those checks.  Turning a table into a
> > >> view with a manual CREATE RULE operation has always been a kluge, and
> > >> it's missing a check that the table isn't part of an inheritance tree.

Is there a "specific" reason why views can't be part of an inheritance tree?
I mean: it's that we "don't want" it or it would be just difficult to implement?

L'email della prossima generazione? Puoi averla con la nuova Yahoo! Mail:


pgsql-general by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2008-03-03 23:26:57
Subject: Re: partitioning using dblink
Previous:From: DeeDate: 2008-03-03 21:33:22
Subject: Re: beginner: what permissions required to install on windows 2000+

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group