Jelte Fennema <Jelte(dot)Fennema(at)microsoft(dot)com> writes: > Personally, I would love to see this backpatched. Since together with a second bug I reported it's causing high query timeouts in Citus even if tcp_user_timeout is set to a low value. I do understand your worry though. Would a patch like the one I attached now be a better fit for a backport?
The only way that could work as-intended is if c.h includes whatever header provides TCP_USER_TIMEOUT, which does not seem like a great idea.