Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: PostgreSQL enterprise references

From: Christopher Browne <cbbrowne(at)acm(dot)org>
To: pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: PostgreSQL enterprise references
Date: 2004-12-14 13:49:17
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-advocacy

It's well and good; I have pointed a number of people to it, and use it
myself for "small scale corporate accounting."  

But while there are doubtless numerous such small installations, I'd
expect an "enterprise reference" to involve an organization with at
least tens of millions of dollars of sales, if not hundreds of
millions.  (Dollars, pounds, euros, I wouldn't too much care...)

At some levels, it can doubtless handle such large numbers, but I just
don't think anyone's using it at quite the "enterprise" level.
(format nil "~S(at)~S" "cbbrowne" "")
I was just  wondering if the Chinese are busy trying  to deal with the
"Year Of The Dragon" bug.

In response to

pgsql-advocacy by date

Next:From: eleinDate: 2004-12-14 20:05:43
Subject: Re: Solutions Linux 2005 Feb 1,2,3 Paris
Previous:From: Marc G. FournierDate: 2004-12-13 19:23:35
Subject: Re: Solutions Linux 2005 Feb 1,2,3 Paris

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group