Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: COPY FROM performance improvements

From: "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
To: <llonergan(at)greenplum(dot)com>
Cc: <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, <markw(at)osdl(dot)org>, <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,<alvherre(at)surnet(dot)cl>, <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,<agoldshuv(at)greenplum(dot)com>, <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>,<maryedie(at)osdl(dot)org>
Subject: Re: COPY FROM performance improvements
Date: 2005-07-22 05:27:41
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patchespgsql-performance
this discussion belongs on -performance



Luke Lonergan said:
> Joshua,
> On 7/21/05 7:53 PM, "Joshua D. Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> Well I know that isn't true at least not with ANY of the Dells my
>> customers have purchased in the last 18 months. They are still really,
>> really slow.
> That's too bad, can you cite some model numbers?  SCSI?
>> I have great success with Silicon Image as long as I am running them
>> with Linux software RAID. The LSI controllers are also really nice.
> That's good to hear, I gave up on Silicon Image controllers on Linux
> about 1 year ago, which kernel are you using with success?  Silicon
> Image
> controllers are the most popular, so it's important to see them
> supported well, though I'd rather see more SATA headers than 2 off of
> the built-in chipsets.
> - Luke

In response to

pgsql-performance by date

Next:From: Dawid KuroczkoDate: 2005-07-22 09:10:05
Subject: Planner doesn't look at LIMIT?
Previous:From: Luke LonerganDate: 2005-07-22 04:19:04
Subject: Re: COPY FROM performance improvements

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Simon RiggsDate: 2005-07-22 07:51:26
Subject: Re: Writing Commit Status hint bits (was Re: [HACKERS] Constant
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2005-07-22 05:00:45
Subject: Re: Timezone bugs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group