| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Bryan White" <bryan(at)arcamax(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "pgsql-general" <pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Vacuum analyze vs just Vacuum |
| Date: | 2000-05-28 15:45:22 |
| Message-ID: | 3253.959528722@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Bryan White" <bryan(at)arcamax(dot)com> writes:
> I would just like to check an assumption. I "vacuum analyze" regularly. I
> have always assumed that this did a plain vacuum in addition to gathering
> statistics. Is this true?
Yes. There are some poorly-worded places in the docs that make it sound
like they might be completely separate operations, but they're not.
I would like to split out ANALYZE as a separately-callable command at
some point, but we'll no doubt continue to offer the combined "vacuum
analyze" command, if only for backward-compatibility reasons...
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2000-05-28 17:58:09 | Re: Vacuum analyze vs just Vacuum |
| Previous Message | Bryan White | 2000-05-28 15:23:13 | Vacuum analyze vs just Vacuum |