Re: Improving RLS planning

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net>
Cc: Dean Rasheed <dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Improving RLS planning
Date: 2016-11-13 21:46:05
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Stephen Frost <sfrost(at)snowman(dot)net> writes:
> * Dean Rasheed (dean(dot)a(dot)rasheed(at)gmail(dot)com) wrote:
>> +1 for that terminology and no renaming of fields.

> Agreed.

Here's an updated version of the RLS planning patch that gets rid of
the incorrect interaction with Query.hasRowSecurity and adjusts
terminology as agreed.

regards, tom lane

Attachment Content-Type Size
new-rls-planning-implementation-2.patch.gz application/x-gzip 28.0 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Steve Singer 2016-11-13 22:02:53 Re: Logical Replication WIP
Previous Message Emre Hasegeli 2016-11-13 21:41:01 Re: Floating point comparison inconsistencies of the geometric types