| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Disabling function validation |
| Date: | 2003-10-06 23:13:30 |
| Message-ID: | 3085.1065482010@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> I think we should change the "check_function_bodies" to something more
> general. I like "restore_validation_mode" because it could also be used
> to disable foreign key checks which we are discussing.
I think I'd prefer to keep foreign key check disabling separate. Or at
least make it separately selectable. Maybe validation_mode could have
multiple levels ("off", "safe", "risky")?
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-06 23:17:22 | Re: Disabling function validation |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-06 22:52:44 | Disabling function validation |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2003-10-06 23:17:22 | Re: Disabling function validation |
| Previous Message | Rod Taylor | 2003-10-06 22:59:43 | rserv and inet data type |