Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)kaigai(dot)gr(dot)jp>, KaiGai Kohei <kaigai(at)ak(dot)jp(dot)nec(dot)com>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Largeobject access controls
Date: 2009-09-22 17:59:52
Message-ID: 3073cc9b0909221059g5d030916sa93a3c218d30607a@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 12:53 PM, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 22, 2009 at 1:29 PM, Jaime Casanova
> <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> wrote:
>> have anyone better ideas about the name? if not, then go with
>> pg_largeobject_meta
>
> I don't think there's anything wrong with calling it metadata.  That
> seems to leave the door open to future things we might want to do,
> without restricting it to security-related settings or whatever.  But
> I don't see any reason to abbreviate it either - I'd go with
> pg_largeobject_metadata rather than just pg_largeobject_meta.
>

ok! metadata is self explanatory meta is not...
at least not for someone that his mother tongue is spanish and think
of "meta" like in "goal" ;)

--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Tom Lane 2009-09-22 18:26:32 Re: Anonymous code blocks
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2009-09-22 17:57:07 Re: Anonymous code blocks vs CREATE LANGUAGE