Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: TODO items

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: TODO items
Date: 2009-07-02 21:54:52
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jul 2, 2009 at 4:50 PM, Tom Lane<tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> writes:
>> Jaime Casanova wrote:
>>> I guess todo items marked as [D] (Done) should be removed now... right?
>> Would there be some value in creating a new page TodoDone84 and moving
>> those items to it?
> In the past we've figured that old TODO versions could be retrieved
> from CVS history.  While that's still possible in the wiki environment,
> it might be worth saving the old entries in a more easily accessible
> fashion.

We want to use the same format/sections like in the TODO?

Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-07-02 22:04:23
Subject: Re: TODO items
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-07-02 21:52:21
Subject: Re: TODO items

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group