Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Partitioning feature ...

From: Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>
Cc: Nikhil Sontakke <nikhil(dot)sontakke(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Kedar Potdar <kedar(dot)potdar(at)gmail(dot)com>, Emmanuel Cecchet <manu(at)asterdata(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, Amit Gupta <amit(dot)pc(dot)gupta(at)gmail(dot)com>
Subject: Re: Partitioning feature ...
Date: 2009-03-31 15:21:01
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 31, 2009 at 9:46 AM, Alvaro Herrera
<alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
>> AFAICS, we do not have any category like system triggers. So yeah, it would
>> have been nice to generate triggers with names (starting with __ for
>> example) for such special triggers. But I don't think we disallow
>> user-triggers starting with underscores etc.
> We already have system triggers -- the FK triggers.  I don't think we've
> had all that much trouble with them.

yeah! but we mark them with pg_trigger.tgisconstraint, but i'm not
completely convinced that we should use that same field

Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157

In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tom LaneDate: 2009-03-31 15:31:18
Subject: Re: [GENERAL] pgstattuple triggered checkpoint failure and database outage?
Previous:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2009-03-31 15:17:25
Subject: Re: Fwd: Abwesend: [GENERAL] string_to_array with emptyinput

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group