From: | Jaime Casanova <jcasanov(at)systemguards(dot)com(dot)ec> |
---|---|
To: | Matteo Beccati <php(at)beccati(dot)com> |
Cc: | Guillaume Smet <guillaume(dot)smet(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, xuan--2009(dot)03--submitbug--support--postgresql(dot)org(at)baldauf(dot)org, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
Subject: | Re: [HACKERS] Re: BUG #4689: Expanding the length of a VARCHAR column should not induce a table rewrite |
Date: | 2009-03-05 19:26:51 |
Message-ID: | 3073cc9b0903051126t49db73ady7a46528b06d9658d@mail.gmail.com |
Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
Thread: | |
Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Mar 5, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Matteo Beccati <php(at)beccati(dot)com> wrote:
> Guillaume Smet ha scritto:
>> On Wed, Mar 4, 2009 at 11:50 AM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
>>> The question is how you want to implement this in a data type independent
>>> fashion. You can't assume that increasing the typmod is a noop for all data
>>> types.
>>
>> Sure. See my previous answer on -hackers (I don't think this
>> discussion belong to -bugs) and especially the discussion in the
>> archives about Jonas' patch.
>
> I recently had a similar problem when I added some domains to the
> application. ALTER TABLE ... TYPE varchar_dom was leading to a full
> table rewrite even though the underlying type definition were exactly
> the same (i.e. varchar(64)). I can live with it, but I suppose this fix
> might be related to the varlen one.
>
ALTER TABLE ... TYPE does cause a table rewrite even if new_type =
old_type, and that is actually useful...
for example when you add a fillfactor to an existing table that
fillfactor will not affect the existing data until you rewrite the
table and a convenient way is exactly using ALTER TABLE ... TYPE.
now, back to the problem... is not easier to define a column as TEXT
and to put a check to constraint the length? if you wanna change the
constraint that will be almost free
--
Atentamente,
Jaime Casanova
Soporte y capacitación de PostgreSQL
Asesoría y desarrollo de sistemas
Guayaquil - Ecuador
Cel. +59387171157
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-03-05 19:46:22 | Re: Re: [BUGS] BUG #4689: Expanding the length of a VARCHAR column should not induce a table rewrite |
Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2009-03-05 19:15:26 | Re: Expanding the length of a VARCHAR column should not induce a table rewrite |
From | Date | Subject | |
---|---|---|---|
Next Message | Tom Lane | 2009-03-05 19:37:05 | Re: building pg_dump doesn't work |
Previous Message | Magnus Hagander | 2009-03-05 19:19:05 | Re: Make SIGHUP less painful if pg_hba.conf is not readable |