| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Geoghegan <pg(at)bowt(dot)ie>, Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)alvh(dot)no-ip(dot)org>, David Rowley <dgrowleyml(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Developers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Should we put command options in alphabetical order in the doc? |
| Date: | 2023-04-19 21:45:41 |
| Message-ID: | 3024596.1681940741@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Melanie Plageman <melanieplageman(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I do think we should consider deprecating and dropping documentation of
> the options that are supported without parentheses (relevant to commands
> like ANALYZE, CLUSTER, VACUUM, and others). It is fine if we keep the
> code to make ANALYZE VERBOSE work, but I don't think it is useful to
> keep that documented. That is not a concern of this patch, however.
I doubt it's a great idea to de-document syntax that's still allowed
and will still be widely used for years to come; that just promotes
confusion. However, we could do something similar to what we did
for COPY years ago, and move the un-parenthesized syntax to the
"Compatibility" section.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | David Rowley | 2023-04-19 22:37:49 | Re: Incremental sort for access method with ordered scan support (amcanorderbyop) |
| Previous Message | Aleksander Alekseev | 2023-04-19 21:44:21 | Re: [PATCH] Allow Postgres to pick an unused port to listen |