Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY

From: Don Baccus <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
To: Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Book and TEMP vs. TEMPORARY
Date: 2000-04-06 17:11:54
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
At 11:38 AM 4/6/00 -0400, Bruce Momjian wrote:
>> Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> > I am doing the chapter on temporary tables.  Should I show examples
>> > using TEMP or TEMPORARY?
>> TEMPORARY is SQL92 standard, TEMP is not.  Nuff said...
>OK, but TEMPORARY doesn't work on 6.5.*, right?

Won't 7.0 be the release version by the time the book is actually
published? :)

- Don Baccus, Portland OR <dhogaza(at)pacifier(dot)com>
  Nature photos, on-line guides, Pacific Northwest
  Rare Bird Alert Service and other goodies at

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Don BaccusDate: 2000-04-06 17:33:11
Subject: Re: pg_dumplo, thanks :) (fwd)
Previous:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-04-06 17:10:12
Subject: Vacuuming temporary tables

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group