| From: | Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz <gryzman(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Pet Peeves? |
| Date: | 2009-02-05 11:35:29 |
| Message-ID: | 2f4958ff0902050335t302eb5b4k412d9cd84aeed0b1@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
On Wed, Feb 4, 2009 at 9:09 PM, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net> wrote:
> On Wednesday 04 February 2009 20:36:24 Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote:
>> I dream about db wide checks on tables, without need to write
>> expensive triggers.
>> Basically, something that would run a select query after
>> insert/update/delete and based on result commit or rollback.
>> unless there's something like that already in SQL (I am not aware of
>> all features in sql2008 draft).
>
> Sounds like ASSERTION, standard SQL feature. Certainly interesting.
>
I was sure something like that existed, but had no idea about name.
It also shouldn't be very hard to add, me guesses.
--
GJ
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Simon Riggs | 2009-02-05 11:46:52 | Re: Pet Peeves? |
| Previous Message | Greg Stark | 2009-02-05 11:08:34 | Re: Pet Peeves? |