| From: | "Pavan Deolasee" <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Gauri Kanekar" <meetgaurikanekar(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Shane Ambler" <pgsql(at)sheeky(dot)biz>, "Alvaro Herrera" <alvherre(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, "Greg Smith" <gsmith(at)gregsmith(dot)com>, pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Replication Syatem |
| Date: | 2008-04-30 06:43:11 |
| Message-ID: | 2e78013d0804292343hd9d1c0lf93df68e559f9af3@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-performance |
On Wed, Apr 30, 2008 at 11:09 AM, Gauri Kanekar
<meetgaurikanekar(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
> relid | relname | n_tup_ins | n_tup_upd | n_tup_hot_upd | n_dead_tup
> -------+----------------+-----------+-----------+---------------+------------
> 16461 | table1 | 0 | 8352496 | 5389 | 8351242
>
Hmm.. So indeed there are very few HOT updates. What is the fillfactor
you are using for these tests ? If its much less than 100, the very
low percentage of HOT updates would make me guess that you are
updating one of the index columns. Otherwise at least the initial
updates until you fill up the free space should be HOT.
Thanks,
Pavan
--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gauri Kanekar | 2008-04-30 06:49:04 | Re: Replication Syatem |
| Previous Message | Len Shapiro | 2008-04-30 06:32:18 | Re: Understanding histograms |