Re: [PERFORM] Very slow (2 tuples/second) sequential scan after bulk insert; speed returns to ~500 tuples/second after commit

On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 10:44 PM, Heikki Linnakangas
<heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> wrote:

>
> Imagine that you start a transaction just before transaction
> wrap-around, so that the top level XID is 2^31-10. Then you start 20
> subtransactions. What XIDs will they get? Now how would you map those to
> a bitmap?
>

Wait. Subtransaction ids are local to a transaction and always start from 1.
See this:

/*
* reinitialize within-transaction counters
*/
s->subTransactionId = TopSubTransactionId;
currentSubTransactionId = TopSubTransactionId;

>
> It's not that common to have hundreds of thousands of subtransactions to
> begin with..

True. But thats the case we are trying to solve here :-)

Thanks,
Pavan

--
Pavan Deolasee
EnterpriseDB http://www.enterprisedb.com