Re: ResourceOwner refactoring

From: Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka(at)iki(dot)fi>
To: Julien Rouhaud <rjuju123(at)gmail(dot)com>, Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com>
Cc: "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: ResourceOwner refactoring
Date: 2022-10-31 09:51:36
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 12/01/2022 07:57, Julien Rouhaud wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 26, 2021 at 8:41 PM Aleksander Alekseev
> <aleksander(at)timescale(dot)com> wrote:
>> The patchset is in a good shape. I'm changing the status to "Ready for
>> Committer".
> The 2nd patch doesn't apply anymore due to a conflict on
> resowner_private.h:

Rebased version attached. Given that Aleksander marked this as Ready for
Committer earlier, I'll add this to the next commitfest in that state,
and will commit in the next few days, barring any new objections.

- Heikki

Attachment Content-Type Size
v12-0001-Move-a-few-ResourceOwnerEnlarge-calls-for-safety.patch text/x-patch 8.9 KB
v12-0002-Make-resowners-more-easily-extensible.patch text/x-patch 94.0 KB
v12-0003-Use-a-faster-hash-function-in-resource-owners.patch text/x-patch 2.6 KB

In response to


Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Heikki Linnakangas 2022-10-31 10:05:32 Re: resowner "cold start" overhead
Previous Message Etsuro Fujita 2022-10-31 09:27:53 Error for row-level triggers with transition tables on partitioned tables