| From: | "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Melanie <melanie(at)dunslane(dot)net>, pgsql-advocacy(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval] |
| Date: | 2008-10-28 14:59:18 |
| Message-ID: | 2b5e566d0810280759s74dc51d9ve90476d4fe30d92b@mail.gmail.com |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy |
On Tue, Oct 28, 2008 at 7:49 AM, Joshua D. Drake <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com> wrote:
> Melanie wrote:
>>
>> Since the .us list is now slowed down by being a moderated list, I want to
>> confirm before friday that the deletion of my(and whomever else's) email
>> address and then it being readded, did not ALSO result in my vote being
>> deleted. I just assume I don't need to vote again and want to confirm.
>
> Melanie,
>
> pgus-general is not a moderated list. The members@ list is. The members@
> list is meant to be an announce list which is why it is moderated.
Josh,
Melanie was talking about the postgresql.us mailing list - which she
indicated above.
Perhaps you meant to name that list members-announce(at)postgresql(dot)us?
The impression you gave me by simply calling it 'members' is that this
is a list designed to bring people together, which doesn't work very
well when we can't talk to each other.
-selena
--
Selena Deckelmann
PDXPUG - http://pugs.postgresql.org/pdx
Me - http://www.chesnok.com/daily
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Melanie | 2008-10-28 15:10:03 | Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval] |
| Previous Message | Joshua D. Drake | 2008-10-28 14:49:16 | Re: [Fwd: Your message to Members awaits moderator approval] |