Re: RT Schema

From: "Selena Deckelmann" <selenamarie(at)gmail(dot)com>
To: "Randal L(dot) Schwartz" <merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com>
Cc: "Daniel Johnson" <teknotus(at)gmail(dot)com>, "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>, "PDX PostgreSQL Users" <pdxpug(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: RT Schema
Date: 2008-02-25 23:02:12
Message-ID: 2b5e566d0802251502l2733162aq94dcc7e14ce5dff4@mail.gmail.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pdxpug

Welcome back, Randal.

On Mon, Feb 25, 2008 at 2:53 PM, Randal L. Schwartz
<merlyn(at)stonehenge(dot)com> wrote:
>
> Randal> So <http://pugs.postgresql.org/node/158> which is the most recent
> Randal> info I could find on the web, is wrong?
>
> Randal> Can we please have an updated post?
>
> Not only that, but I don't see anything on this mailing list either. No
> *wonder* I didn't know. Nobody ever said anything to any place in cyberspace!

It is a wonder :)

Most updated post (from last week): http://pugs.postgresql.org/node/154

There were also 5-6 mailing list messages on PDXPUG, Code-n-splode and
Perl Mongers.

See some threads at:

http://archives.postgresql.org/pdxpug/2008-02/index.php

-selena

--
Selena Deckelmann
PDXPUG - Portland PostgreSQL Users Group
http://pugs.postgresql.org/pdx
http://www.chesnok.com/daily

In response to

Responses

Browse pdxpug by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Randal L. Schwartz 2008-02-25 23:04:04 Re: RT Schema
Previous Message Randal L. Schwartz 2008-02-25 22:53:47 Re: RT Schema