Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Review: listagg aggregate

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Scott Bailey <artacus(at)comcast(dot)net>, "pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org Hackers" <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate
Date: 2010-01-25 19:29:39
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Jan 25, 2010, at 6:12 AM, Pavel Stehule wrote:

> I am not happy, I thing so we do bigger chaos then it is. But it
> hasn't progress. So I agree with name string_agg. In this case isn't a
> problem rename this function if somebody would.

Could you not use CREATE AGGREGATE to create an alias named listagg if you needed it? Or are we limited to a single argument in that case?


In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Tim BunceDate: 2010-01-25 19:31:10
Subject: Re: Miscellaneous changes to plperl [PATCH]
Previous:From: David E. WheelerDate: 2010-01-25 19:27:57
Subject: Re: Review: listagg aggregate

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group