Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: plpython3

From: "David E(dot) Wheeler" <david(at)kineticode(dot)com>
To: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, James William Pye <lists(at)jwp(dot)name>, Greg Smith <greg(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: plpython3
Date: 2010-02-01 19:13:50
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
On Feb 1, 2010, at 10:53 AM, Tom Lane wrote:

> The first thought that comes to mind is "plpythonng", following a
> tradition established by the tcl client rewrite among others ... but
> that double n doesn't read very well.

And without it, you have a thong. Who's going to wear that?



In response to

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: James William PyeDate: 2010-02-01 19:18:02
Subject: Re: plpython3
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2010-02-01 19:03:38
Subject: Re: [BUG?] strange behavior in ALTER TABLE ... RENAME TO on inherited columns

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2018 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group