Jaime Casanova <systemguards(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On 1/3/06, pres <pgn(dot)lists(at)gmail(dot)com> wrote:
>> i would find it helpful if Table 42-1 included a column that identified
>> whehter each catalog is shared or not. convenient, but given that the
>> documentation does contain it, not necessary.
> is this acceptable or usefull? if so, i can do it after work...
It seems like clutter to me. Whether a catalog is shared or not is not
necessarily the first thing you want to know about it.
regards, tom lane