| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Log rotation? |
| Date: | 2001-09-06 04:04:14 |
| Message-ID: | 29597.999749054@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
Ian Lance Taylor <ian(at)airs(dot)com> writes:
> Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>>> And no, "use syslog" doesn't count.
>>
>> Why not?
> The standard implementations of syslog lose log entries under heavy
> load,
Okay, that's a sufficient answer for that point.
> (My personal preference these days is an approach like DJB's
> daemontools, which separates the handling of log entries from the
> program doing the logging.)
That still leads back to my first question, which is whether we can't
rely on someone else's logrotation code.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2001-09-06 04:49:54 | Re: Bad behaviour when inserting unspecified variable length datatypes |
| Previous Message | Ian Lance Taylor | 2001-09-06 03:54:44 | Re: Log rotation? |