Bruce Momjian <maillist(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
>> [ should we work harder to ensure pg_listener entries get cleaned out? ]
> Seems like we should try and clean them out, especially when the backend
> is doing a normal exit. In a panic exit, we don't need to clean it out.
OK, I will add some more code to try to cope with the exit-during-
> We can install something into proc_exit() and shmem_exit() to clean out
> the table.
The old code inserted the cleanup action into shmem_exit(). Is that the
right list to put it in? I'm not clear on the difference between
shmem_exit and proc_exit lists...
> You can have a global variable that installed the pg_listen
> cleaner the first time a notify() is done so as not to install a new
> exit handler for each notify() call.
That part's already done.
regards, tom lane
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Vadim Mikheev||Date: 1998-10-02 01:20:25|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking|
|Previous:||From: Tom Lane||Date: 1998-10-02 00:25:15|
|Subject: Re: [HACKERS] It sorta works, but I'm confused about locking |