Jim Nasby <decibel(at)decibel(dot)org> writes:
> Any time this happens it's generally a nasty surprise for users.
Really? Running out of work memory is expected on large tables.
> It would be nice to throw them an explicit warning that it's occurring.
I think this is a bad idea. It's furthermore pretty useless in the
autovacuum world, since no one is likely to see the warning.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-patches by date
|Next:||From: William Lawrance||Date: 2007-05-09 20:12:17|
|Subject: Re: ECPG patch to use prepare for improved performance|
|Previous:||From: Jim Nasby||Date: 2007-05-09 18:01:18|
|Subject: Have vacuum emit a warning when it runs out of maintenance_work_mem|