Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Devrim GÜNDÜZ <devrim(at)gunduz(dot)org>, Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com>, PostgreSQL-development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Streaming replication and postmaster signaling
Date: 2010-01-07 18:21:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> I like Andres' suggestion upthread of setting a deadline and
> determining to bounce the patch if it's not committed by that date.
> If it turns out we have to bounce it, that stinks, but I don't think
> it makes sense to go to beta with a huge, barely-tested pile of code
> in the tree.  Not that the testing Heikki and Fujii Masao have been
> doing until now hasn't been good, but it's not nearly as rigorous as
> what we will get when all of our users start banging on it.

This argument would hold more water if there weren't *already* a huge,
barely-tested pile of code in the tree, namely HS.  If you think that's
anywhere near ready to go to beta, I'm afraid I'd better disillusion
you immediately.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Andres FreundDate: 2010-01-07 18:23:27
Subject: Re: Hot Standy introduced problem with query cancel behavior
Previous:From: Robert HaasDate: 2010-01-07 18:16:37
Subject: Re: Small locking bugs in hs

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group