| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Jan Kantert <jan-postgres(at)kantert(dot)net>, pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #5727: Indexes broken in streaming replication |
| Date: | 2010-10-26 18:08:15 |
| Message-ID: | 29047.1288116495@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs |
Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(dot)linnakangas(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> * Operations on hash indexes are not presently WAL-logged, so replay will not update these indexes. Hash indexes will not be used for query plans during recovery.
> The initial patch indeed had a special-case in the planner to ignore
> hash indexes during hot standby, but it was left out because the lack of
> WAL-logging is a general problem with hash indexes, not a hot standby
> issue.
Yeah, and also the index would still be broken after the slave exits hot
standby and becomes live; so that hack didn't cure the problem anyway.
> I'd be tempted to remove that caveat altogether for the same
> reason, but it's probably good to have that note there and just remove
> the sentence about query plans:
Agreed.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-10-26 18:48:44 | Re: Recovery bug |
| Previous Message | Heikki Linnakangas | 2010-10-26 18:01:09 | Re: BUG #5727: Indexes broken in streaming replication |