Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Switching to XML

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>
Cc: Guillaume Lelarge <guillaume(at)lelarge(dot)info>, "Joshua D(dot) Drake" <jd(at)commandprompt(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Josh Berkus <josh(at)agliodbs(dot)com>, pgsql-docs(at)postgresql(dot)org, David Blewett <david(at)dawninglight(dot)net>
Subject: Re: Switching to XML
Date: 2006-12-10 06:02:46
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-docs
David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org> writes:
> In addition to the long-standing problem that there is no way to edit
> the SGML docs with any known GUI tool,

The point not in evidence is that there exists a GUI tool we'd accept
for editing XML-format docs.  Can you point to some that don't mess up
XML source code to the point of being unreadable?

> ... That Tom found
> a need to fork a document tool, i.e. take ownership of a whole large
> piece of software, that being what forking means, is a neon sign that
> means, "we're stuck with broken tools."

Um, I spend all day every day on making sometimes-comparable
improvements in Postgres.  Will you abandon Postgres as soon as
someone points out a(nother) serious performance bug in it?

As for "fork", I have no intention of forking anything --- that patch
is already submitted upstream.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-docs by date

Next:From: Peter EisentrautDate: 2006-12-10 08:43:38
Subject: Re: Switching to XML
Previous:From: Joshua D. DrakeDate: 2006-12-10 05:56:35
Subject: Re: Switching to XML

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group