Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: column check mistake or not?

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Rodriguez Fernando <rodriguez(at)ort(dot)edu(dot)uy>
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: column check mistake or not?
Date: 2011-05-09 14:00:29
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
Rodriguez Fernando <rodriguez(at)ort(dot)edu(dot)uy> writes:
> Yesterday i did a mistake executing one query, i use a column daes not 
> exists in the table the result was all rows of the table.
> Platform Fedora 14 32 bits
> Version Postgresql 9.0.2

> The column id_documento not exists in t_log_modificar_deuda, this 
> behavior is correct or not?

> query
> select * from t_documento where (importe_deudor_documento > 
> importe_documento) or id_documento in (select id_documento from 
> t_log_modificar_deuda);

> result all column of t_documento.

Yes, it is.  That's an outer reference to the id_documento from
t_documento, so of course the IN will succeed (assuming id_documento
isn't null and there's at least one row in t_log_modificar_deuda).

Outer references are a SQL feature that bites novices fairly often :-(
but on the other hand sub-selects would be far less useful without them.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: pedro mgDate: 2011-05-09 18:07:25
Subject: BUG #6017: COPY from CSV file, WITH CSV HEADER fields order not respected
Previous:From: asuffieldDate: 2011-05-09 13:03:05
Subject: BUG #6016: Documentation makes inappropriate reference to boolean logic

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group