Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: variadic function support

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>
Cc: Pavel Stehule <pavel(dot)stehule(at)gmail(dot)com>, pgsql-patches <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: variadic function support
Date: 2008-06-23 18:10:24
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
Andrew Dunstan <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> writes:
> This proposal strikes me as half-baked. Either we need proper and full 
> support for variadic functions, or we don't, but I don't think we need 
> syntactic sugar like the above (or maybe in this case it's really 
> syntactic saccharine).

What would you consider "proper and full support"?

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Neil ConwayDate: 2008-06-23 18:12:08
Subject: Re: A GUC variable to replace PGBE_ACTIVITY_SIZE
Previous:From: Andrew DunstanDate: 2008-06-23 16:46:28
Subject: Re: variadic function support

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group