Fujii Masao <masao(dot)fujii(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> Euler proposed one more patch upthread, which replaces pg_size_pretty(bigint)
> with pg_size_pretty(numeric) so that pg_size_pretty(pg_xlog_location_diff())
> succeeds. It's also worth committing this patch?
Why would it be useful to use pg_size_pretty on xlog locations?
-1 because of the large expense of bigint->numeric->whatever conversion
that would be added to existing uses.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Robert Haas||Date: 2012-03-09 14:44:08|
|Subject: Re: xlog location arithmetic|
|Previous:||From: Thom Brown||Date: 2012-03-09 14:35:17|
|Subject: Re: Command Triggers, patch v11|