Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>
Cc: Magnus Hagander <magnus(at)hagander(dot)net>, Stefan Kaltenbrunner <stefan(at)kaltenbrunner(dot)cc>, Kim Bisgaard <kim+pg(at)alleroedderne(dot)adsl(dot)dk>, Greg Stark <gsstark(at)mit(dot)edu>, Joe Abbate <jma(at)freedomcircle(dot)com>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Getting a bug tracker for the Postgres project
Date: 2011-05-31 16:01:09
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackers
Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 10:02 AM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> I kinda wonder why the CF app doesn't work like that, actually.
>> (Yeah, I know the poor thread linking in the archives is an issue.)

> I thought this pretty much WAS how the CF app works, except that it's
> for patches rather than bugs.  Perhaps it could be extended to also
> track bugs...

Well, the point is you have to go and manually fool around with the web
interface to enter something into CF, rather than just cc'ing it on your
patch or review email.

			regards, tom lane

In response to


pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Alvaro HerreraDate: 2011-05-31 16:04:07
Subject: creating CHECK constraints as NOT VALID
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2011-05-31 15:59:11
Subject: Re: Please test peer (socket ident) auth on *BSD

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group