Reinhard Max <max(at)suse(dot)de> wrote on 12.01.2005, 11:38:55:
> On Wed, 12 Jan 2005 at 03:53, Tom Lane wrote:
> > > ...or is it because his postings to ANNOUNCE that the port to SUSE
> > > have gone unnoticed by those that compile the supported platforms
> > > list?
> > If he insists on posting such routine stuff to pgsql-announce, he
> > should not be too surprised that his postings do not get approved.
> > That isn't the correct forum. We don't peruse the New York Times
> > classified ads for such reports, either ...
> no need to be rude to me for posting one single email to ANNOUNCE
> after years of providing the SUSE RPMs silently. There were other
> posts about RPM builds on ANNOUNCE, so I thought it would be the right
> place to announce mine as well.
Please no more. I started this, so I apologise now to both of you, and
to the list and hope this ends here.
We all look forward to SUSE being a listed port.
Best Regards, Simon Riggs
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2005-01-12 15:29:23|
|Subject: Re: SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)|
|Previous:||From: simon||Date: 2005-01-12 13:48:01|
|Subject: Re: Re: SUSE port (was [ANNOUNCE] PostgreSQL 8.0.0 Release Candidate 5)|