Re: Win32 BYTE_ORDER

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net>
Cc: pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Win32 BYTE_ORDER
Date: 2006-10-19 20:11:43
Message-ID: 2825.1161288703@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches

"Magnus Hagander" <mha(at)sollentuna(dot)net> writes:
>> Done, but I think you forgot the defs for LITTLE_ENDIAN and
>> friends ... it seems unlikely that a platform would provide
>> those and then forget BYTE_ORDER.

> Well, it compiled just fine, so it must've found it somewhere :-)

I think the #if tests probably reduced to 0 == 0 ... so my bet is
it compiled but didn't work.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Bruce Momjian 2006-10-19 20:12:42 Beta, RC Time?
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-19 20:07:40 Re: Win32 BYTE_ORDER

Browse pgsql-patches by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-19 20:21:00 oid2name optargs
Previous Message Magnus Hagander 2006-10-19 20:07:40 Re: Win32 BYTE_ORDER