| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Francisco Figueiredo Jr(dot)" <fxjrlists(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> |
| Cc: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org, pgsql-jdbc(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? |
| Date: | 2005-02-24 22:32:48 |
| Message-ID: | 28071.1109284368@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-jdbc |
"Francisco Figueiredo Jr." <fxjrlists(at)yahoo(dot)com(dot)br> writes:
> Could I add another item?
> Could we have the row count of statements executed inside a
> procedure/function returned to client?
IMHO that request is completely bogus; if the procedure wants to tell
the client that, it's the procedure's responsibility to return the
number as a result. Doing what you ask (a) would arguably be a security
violation, and (b) the info would be impossible for the client to
interpret in any but the most trivial cases anyway. Consider for
instance a procedure that contains different queries in the THEN and
the ELSE arms of an IF, or contains loops executed a variable number
of times. Without access to the results of the control flow tests, the
client could not know which number means what.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Marc G. Fournier | 2005-02-24 22:38:12 | Re: Some download statistics |
| Previous Message | Bruce Momjian | 2005-02-24 22:28:44 | Re: [PATCHES] [pgsql-hackers-win32] Repleacement for src/port/snprintf.c |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Gavin Sherry | 2005-02-24 23:23:31 | Re: Where are we on stored procedures? |
| Previous Message | Francisco Figueiredo Jr. | 2005-02-24 21:49:35 | Re: [JDBC] Where are we on stored procedures? |