Re: Parameter for planner estimate of recursive queries

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>
Cc: Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: Parameter for planner estimate of recursive queries
Date: 2022-03-23 20:25:36
Message-ID: 2796462.1648067136@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

Simon Riggs <simon(dot)riggs(at)enterprisedb(dot)com> writes:
>> [New patch version pending]

Do you have any objection if I rename the GUC to
recursive_worktable_factor? That seems a bit clearer as to what
it does, and it leaves more room for other knobs in the same area
if we decide we need any.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Responses

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Robert Haas 2022-03-23 20:34:04 multithreaded zstd backup compression for client and server
Previous Message Andrew Dunstan 2022-03-23 20:23:58 Re: SQL/JSON: functions