Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: BUG #6463: tables can have at most 1600 columns

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: khalil(dot)alijani(at)gmail(dot)com
Cc: pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: BUG #6463: tables can have at most 1600 columns
Date: 2012-02-18 16:30:22
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-bugs
> I drop a column but Postgresql still shows old (deleted) columns...

> My Java program does this:
> drop a boolean column and then add same column (with same name and
> specification), in dozens times, because updating (this) column is very slow
> !!!
> AND finally it says "tables can have at most 1600 columns"

Sorry, this is not a bug, or at least we're not going to fix it.
The fact that DROP COLUMN doesn't physically remove the column is an
intentional design decision.  If we didn't do it that way, dropping
a column would require rewriting the entire table (and all its indexes)
and so would be horribly slow.

Perhaps if you discussed why you think that repeatedly dropping and
re-adding a column is a useful thing to do, we could help you find
another way.  The bugs list is not the place for that discussion,

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-bugs by date

Next:From: creesDate: 2012-02-18 17:35:05
Subject: BUG #6465: postgresql-pltcl refuses to compile with 9.1,and FreeBSD does support threaded python
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2012-02-18 16:21:06
Subject: Re: BUG #6462: rpmbuild fails during regression tests on SMP ARM machines

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group