Zdenek Kotala <Zdenek(dot)Kotala(at)Sun(dot)COM> writes:
> I hit a problem with libtcl.so that LDFLAGS is not propagated. The same
> problem is with other PL languages as well.
> Is it intention or a bug?
It's intentional; LDFLAGS is for linking executables and may not be
suitable for shlibs. I see that Makefile.shlib makes exceptions for
some platforms though. What *specific* problem are you having, on what
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Peter Eisentraut||Date: 2009-04-23 15:11:31|
|Subject: Re: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS|
|Previous:||From: Zdenek Kotala||Date: 2009-04-23 14:50:47|
|Subject: PL compilations ignores LDFLAGS|