| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> |
| Cc: | Heikki Linnakangas <heikki(at)enterprisedb(dot)com>, Csaba Nagy <nagy(at)ecircle-ag(dot)com>, Stephen Denne <Stephen(dot)Denne(at)datamail(dot)co(dot)nz>, Hannu Krosing <hannu(at)krosing(dot)net>, pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Date: | 2008-06-04 18:23:38 |
| Message-ID: | 27600.1212603818@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-advocacy pgsql-hackers |
Jeff Davis <pgsql(at)j-davis(dot)com> writes:
> On Wed, 2008-06-04 at 14:17 +0300, Heikki Linnakangas wrote:
>> These are already covered by the information in pg_control.
> Another thing that can change between systems is the collation behavior,
> which can corrupt indexes (and other bad things).
That is covered by pg_control, at least to the extent of forcing the
same value of LC_COLLATE.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-06-04 18:26:02 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-06-04 17:18:17 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Jeff Davis | 2008-06-04 18:26:02 | Re: Core team statement on replication in PostgreSQL |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2008-06-04 18:22:38 | Re: Overhauling GUCS |