| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Michael Simms" <michael(at)tuxgames(dot)com> |
| Cc: | pgsql-bugs(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: BUG #2784: Performance serious degrades over a period of a month |
| Date: | 2006-11-28 02:59:06 |
| Message-ID: | 27598.1164682746@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-bugs pgsql-performance |
"Michael Simms" <michael(at)tuxgames(dot)com> writes:
> OK, we have a database that runs perfectly well after a dump and restore,
> but over a period of a month or two, it just degrades to the point of
> uselessness.
> vacuumdb -a is run every 24 hours. We have also run for months at a time
> using -a -z but the effect doesnt change.
You probably need significantly-more-frequent vacuuming. Have you
considered autovacuum?
This is not a bug --- you'd get better help on the pgsql-performance
mailing list.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-28 03:01:06 | Re: BUG #2782: Too Many open files in system |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2006-11-28 02:56:50 | Re: BUG #2781: database dump/restore problems |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruno Wolff III | 2006-11-28 04:26:27 | Re: BUG #2784: Performance serious degrades over a period of a month |
| Previous Message | Kevin Grittner | 2006-11-27 18:59:48 | Re: When to vacuum a table? |