| From: | "Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Glen Parker" <glenebob(at)nwlink(dot)com> |
| Cc: | "Postgresql Patches" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and |
| Date: | 2006-12-27 03:24:39 |
| Message-ID: | 2732.24.211.165.134.1167189879.squirrel@www.dunslane.net |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers pgsql-patches |
Glen Parker wrote:
> Alvaro Herrera wrote:
>> As for backpatching, you already knew the answer :-)
>
> Nope, I had no idea this would require initdb...
>
>
Regardless of this, our rule against backpatching new features is well
founded. The stable branches are called stable for a good reason.
cheers
andrew
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-12-27 03:33:14 | Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and |
| Previous Message | Gavin Sherry | 2006-12-27 02:14:47 | Re: Bitmap index thoughts |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Bruce Momjian | 2006-12-27 03:33:14 | Re: Patch(es) to expose n_live_tuples and |
| Previous Message | Euler Taveira de Oliveira | 2006-12-27 01:56:37 | xlog directory at initdb time |