Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

Re: pg_config MSVC makefile

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: "Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk>
Cc: "Bruce Momjian" <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us>,"Andrew Dunstan" <andrew(at)dunslane(dot)net>,"Patches (PostgreSQL)" <pgsql-patches(at)postgresql(dot)org>
Subject: Re: pg_config MSVC makefile
Date: 2005-01-07 17:06:31
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-patches
"Dave Page" <dpage(at)vale-housing(dot)co(dot)uk> writes:
> From: Tom Lane [mailto:tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us] 
>> I recall proposing a couple months ago that we kill those makefiles,
>> but there was at least one objection at the time.

> My main concern is that they don't end up suffering terminal bit-rot
> because I stop helping maintain them - if we ship them, they should
> work.

Don't feel that it's on your head to keep them working.  The project's
attitude towards port-specific files has always been that it's the
responsibility of the users of that port to keep 'em working.  If there
are no users of a port, it will suffer bit-rot, and eventually we'll
decide to remove it.  But I think it's a bit early to declare that there
are no users of the MSVC or Borland ports.

			regards, tom lane

In response to

pgsql-patches by date

Next:From: Dave PageDate: 2005-01-07 17:10:09
Subject: Re: pg_config MSVC makefile
Previous:From: Dave PageDate: 2005-01-07 16:36:43
Subject: Re: pg_config MSVC makefile

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group