Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com> writes:
> On Mon, Feb 28, 2011 at 1:22 PM, Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> wrote:
>> So: exactly what is the intended behavioral change as of now, and what
>> is the argument supporting that change?
> IIUC, this is the result of countless rounds of communal bikeshedding around:
Quite :-(. But I'm not sure where the merry-go-round stopped.
Please notice that the very terms of discussion in that message depend
on a view of wCTEs that has got nothing to do with what was applied.
I'm afraid that the goals of this patch might be similarly obsolete.
I definitely don't want to apply the patch in a hurry just because
we're down to the end of the commitfest.
regards, tom lane
In response to
pgsql-hackers by date
|Next:||From: Josh Berkus||Date: 2011-02-28 18:49:07|
|Subject: Re: mysql2pgsql.perl update|
|Previous:||From: Alvaro Herrera||Date: 2011-02-28 18:44:08|
|Subject: Re: WIP: cross column correlation ...|