-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> I agree. The stuff is certainly accessible in PG-specific tables, so
> the argument that we are missing functionality doesn't hold any water
> IMHO. The question is whether we have to keep information_schema
> pristine. I think that you and Stephan have made enough concrete
> points that the answer to that has to be "stick to the standard".
If there is that much clamor for this, why not make a new schema,
such as "pginformation_schema" People could then tweak the views
to their heart's content, while keeping 100% compliance.
Greg Sabino Mullane greg(at)turnstep(dot)com
PGP Key: 0x14964AC8 200407012226
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----