| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | "Jason L(dot) Buberel" <jason(at)buberel(dot)org> |
| Cc: | pgsql-general(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Subject: | Re: When an index and a constraint have the same name... |
| Date: | 2007-01-31 16:34:30 |
| Message-ID: | 26899.1170261270@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Whole Thread | Raw Message | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-general |
"Jason L. Buberel" <jason(at)buberel(dot)org> writes:
> Thanks for taking a look Tom:
> I am running postgres 8.1.4 on RedHet (CentOS) v4.0. Here is the
> description of the purchase_record table (somewhat abbreviated with
> uninvolved columns omitted):
Well, I was hoping I could duplicate the problem, but I can't; which
means either that it's been fixed since 8.1.4 (but I don't see anything
very relevant-looking in the CVS logs) or that there's some critical
factor we haven't identified about your table definitions.
Could you send me the full "pg_dump -s" output for the two tables?
And/or a stack trace from the point of the errfinish() call? (Note
there will be two errfinish calls, one to print the NOTICE and one
to print the ERROR --- we want to know where the second one comes from.)
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Angva | 2007-01-31 16:34:32 | Re: sequence skips 30 values, how? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2007-01-31 15:53:23 | Re: sequence skips 30 values, how? |