| From: | Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us> |
|---|---|
| To: | Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> |
| Cc: | Peter Eisentraut <peter_e(at)gmx(dot)net>, Jan Wieck <janwieck(at)Yahoo(dot)com>, PostgreSQL Development <pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org> |
| Subject: | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh) |
| Date: | 2000-11-02 20:42:43 |
| Message-ID: | 26714.973197763@sss.pgh.pa.us |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-committers pgsql-hackers |
Bruce Momjian <pgman(at)candle(dot)pha(dot)pa(dot)us> writes:
> Tom, your feelings on this? Does Lamar's argument change anything?
Not for me. I understand Lamar's concern, but the time to be responding
to it was two weeks ago, not today. 7.0.3 is long overdue already ---
and in fact would be out now, had you not been out of town earlier this
week, no?
I also don't like the fact that a commit change appeared without any
prior discussion or even notice ... not the way to do things for a
patch-release, IMHO.
Basically I want to get 7.0.3 out the door so we can focus our full
attention on getting 7.1 to beta. Last-minute marginal hacks are not
the way to go.
regards, tom lane
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | momjian | 2000-11-02 20:53:27 | pgsql/doc (TODO) |
| Previous Message | Karl DeBisschop | 2000-11-02 20:32:47 | Re: Re: [COMMITTERS] pgsql/contrib/pg_dumpaccounts (Makefile README pg_dumpaccounts.sh) |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-02 21:05:54 | Re: Why is failure to find file a "NOTICE"? |
| Previous Message | Tom Lane | 2000-11-02 20:32:58 | Re: Re: [GENERAL] 7.0 vs. 7.1 (was: latest version?) |