Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]

From: Peter Eisentraut <peter(dot)eisentraut(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
To: Alvaro Herrera <alvherre(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>
Cc: Rahila Syed <rahila(dot)syed(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Andres Freund <andres(at)anarazel(dot)de>, Robert Haas <robertmhaas(at)gmail(dot)com>, Simon Riggs <simon(at)2ndquadrant(dot)com>, Pg Hackers <pgsql-hackers(at)lists(dot)postgresql(dot)org>, David Fetter <david(at)fetter(dot)org>, Pavan Deolasee <pavan(dot)deolasee(at)gmail(dot)com>, Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8(at)lab(dot)ntt(dot)co(dot)jp>
Subject: Re: monitoring CREATE INDEX [CONCURRENTLY]
Date: 2019-04-07 10:39:42
Message-ID: 2648f5bb-63ae-aec5-d007-b3cd1931758a@2ndquadrant.com
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-hackers

On 2019-04-06 06:40, Alvaro Herrera wrote:
> On 2019-Apr-05, Peter Eisentraut wrote:
>
>> I've reworded the phases a bit. There was a bit of a mixup of waiting
>> for snapshots and waiting for lockers. Perhaps not so important from a
>> user's perspective, but at least now it's more consistent with the
>> source code comments.
>
> No disagreement with that. Looks reasonable.
>
> I didn't test the patch, but it seems OK in a quick once-over.

committed

--
Peter Eisentraut http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/
PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Remote DBA, Training & Services

In response to

Browse pgsql-hackers by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Andrew Dunstan 2019-04-07 11:56:02 Re: Augment every test postgresql.conf
Previous Message Peter Eisentraut 2019-04-07 08:07:58 Re: Speed up transaction completion faster after many relations are accessed in a transaction