| From: | Nikolay Shaplov <n(dot)shaplov(at)postgrespro(dot)ru> |
|---|---|
| To: | pgsql-hackers(at)postgresql(dot)org |
| Cc: | Michael Paquier <michael(dot)paquier(at)gmail(dot)com> |
| Subject: | Re: pageinspect patch, for showing tuple data |
| Date: | 2015-09-29 14:39:28 |
| Message-ID: | 2626148.AgolR81OzW@nataraj-amd64 |
| Views: | Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email |
| Thread: | |
| Lists: | pgsql-hackers |
В письме от 26 сентября 2015 20:57:25 пользователь Michael Paquier написал:
> > So I would consider two options: Either move t_infomask/t_infomask2
> > details
> > into storage.sgml or leave as it is.
>
> The documentation redirects the reader to look at htup_details.h (the
> documentation is actually incorrect, I sent a separate patch), and I
> see no point in duplicating such low-level descriptions, that would be
> double maintenance for the same result.
What do you think about this? (I've changed only heap_tuple_items
documentation there)
--
Nikolay Shaplov
Postgres Professional: http://www.postgrespro.com
Russian Postgres Company
| Attachment | Content-Type | Size |
|---|---|---|
| pageinspect_show_tuple_datav7.diff | text/x-patch | 34.9 KB |
| From | Date | Subject | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Next Message | Alvaro Herrera | 2015-09-29 14:47:07 | Re: track_commit_timestamp and COMMIT PREPARED |
| Previous Message | Merlin Moncure | 2015-09-29 14:25:47 | Re: No Issue Tracker - Say it Ain't So! |