Skip site navigation (1) Skip section navigation (2)

JDBC now needs updates for large objects

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: Peter Mount <petermount(at)maidstone(dot)gov(dot)uk>
Cc: pgsql-interfaces(at)postgreSQL(dot)org, pgsql-hackers(at)postgreSQL(dot)org
Subject: JDBC now needs updates for large objects
Date: 2000-10-24 01:57:47
Message-ID: (view raw, whole thread or download thread mbox)
Lists: pgsql-hackerspgsql-interfaces

  As of current sources, large objects no longer occupy tables named
'xinvNNNN' nor indexes named 'xinxNNNN'.  Therefore, it'd be appropriate
to remove the special tests that exclude tables/indices named that way
from the tests in  I have not done this because
I'm not in a position to test changes to the JDBC driver; would you
please add it to your todo list?

			regards, tom lane

pgsql-hackers by date

Next:From: Bruce MomjianDate: 2000-10-24 01:59:20
Subject: Re: TODO updates
Previous:From: Tom LaneDate: 2000-10-24 01:53:50
Subject: TODO updates

pgsql-interfaces by date

Next:From: Cedar CoxDate: 2000-10-24 07:42:27
Subject: Re: new maintainer for the ODBC driver?
Previous:From: Joseph ShraibmanDate: 2000-10-23 23:44:41
Subject: Re: RE: datetime fix

Privacy Policy | About PostgreSQL
Copyright © 1996-2017 The PostgreSQL Global Development Group