Re: Postgres 8 vs Postgres 7.4/cygwin

From: Tom Lane <tgl(at)sss(dot)pgh(dot)pa(dot)us>
To: sgoldstein(at)apache(dot)org
Cc: pgsql-performance(at)postgresql(dot)org
Subject: Re: Postgres 8 vs Postgres 7.4/cygwin
Date: 2005-06-24 13:40:27
Message-ID: 26063.1119620427@sss.pgh.pa.us
Views: Raw Message | Whole Thread | Download mbox | Resend email
Thread:
Lists: pgsql-performance

Scott Goldstein <sgoldstein(at)apache(dot)org> writes:
> I'm currently trying to make a decision on whether to use the Cygwin port of Postgres 7.4 or Postgres 8.0 for a windows installation. Can someone provide some comparison info from a performance point of view? I was thinking that the Cygwin port has the overhead of the translation layer, but 8.0 is a newer product and may still have performance issue. Can anyone comment on this?

Well, the performance issues of the cygwin-based releases are the stuff
of legend ;-). New product or no, this is really a no-brainer.

regards, tom lane

In response to

Browse pgsql-performance by date

  From Date Subject
Next Message Yves Vindevogel 2005-06-24 18:18:48 Speed with offset clause
Previous Message Christopher Kings-Lynne 2005-06-24 05:07:17 Re: Postgres 8 vs Postgres 7.4/cygwin